Skip to main content

Here’s what Amazon’s Luna means for you

The other shoe dropped on Thursday — the one we’ve been expecting for a while: Amazon is jumping into the game streaming business . And it could quickly become a major player.

What does the announcement mean for players, though? Ultimately, it could be a very good thing.

Amazon has one of the biggest cloud servers around — one utilized by Netflix and other big streaming services — so gamers won’t have to worry about stuttering or stalls.

That’s potentially bad news for Microsoft, which seemed poised to own game streaming with xCloud’s integration into Game Pass. Google’s Stadia has yet to capture a significant audience and doesn’t have much momentum at present. Luna is also reportedly much easier for developers to work with than Stadia .

Meanwhile, Sony has not shown a clear long-term road map for cloud gaming so far.

Rather than jumping in with a stated intention to own the industry, Amazon’s starting small. Luna is downplaying the latest and greatest games and instead giving players access to a catalog of older games for $6 a month. That lets it work out bugs without ruining a highly anticipated title. And by the time more players are thinking of exploring Luna, it should be ready to stand up to the scrutiny of core gamers.

But even in the short-term, Luna appears to have some notable upsides.

Connections

Amazon, like Google, is working on its own internal games, but those likely won’t be ready for a year or three. But as the world’s largest retailer, Amazon has the ear of every major game publisher. That could help secure limited-time exclusives (vs. xCloud and Stadia – publishers are unlikely to make any game a Luna exclusive anytime soon). It also could ensure a wider catalog of games than Stadia.

Twitch

Integrating Luna into the Twitch community was a no-brainer, but using it as a discovery engine could drive customers just as strongly as Game Pass will bring them to xCloud. Twitch is also home to some of the industry’s biggest influencers, such as Ninja , who will undoubtedly be tapped to promote Luna and its games. That’s awareness a marketing budget can’t pay for. And, for players, it’s a chance to see what the service can really do before they commit to a subscription.

True cross-compatibility

Amazon’s casting a wide net with Luna. The service will, of course, be available on all Amazon Fire TV devices, as well as PC and Mac. And it’s planning apps for the iPhone and iPad, areas neither xCloud nor Stadia have yet ventured. An Android version is forthcoming.

That widespread availability will showcase the flexibility of cloud gaming — and could accelerate its adoption by players.

Amazon Prime

This is the powder Amazon is keeping dry. The company regularly expands Amazon Prime benefits to lure more people to its loyalty program, and Luna, especially in its test period, could be a tempting piece of bait. (Similarly, it could tie in with Twitch Prime — or some future combined program.) How, if at all, Luna will factor into this year’s Prime Day is, of course, unclear, but it’s worth watching.

Amazon didn’t make this move abruptly. The company has been quietly amassing gaming talent for years, including several former Take-Two employees. It has been a sleeping giant that many console manufacturers have been wary of waking.

Now that nap is over. For players, it means another option that expands flexibility and could have an impact on pricing. For the game industry, it’s another step into a new world — where the rules and rulers — have not yet been written.

Competition

There’s an old business cliche: A rising tide lifts all boats. Put another way: The more services that are bringing new people to the industry, the better.

Amazon’s entry in the market will make gaming a more competitive industry — and that could, ultimately, help save consumers money. Google, Amazon, and Microsoft will all aggressively court gamers to their cloud services over the next few years. They’ll be willing to take losses in hopes of buying customer loyalty. The next generation of games will be more expensive than the last one, so anything that can potentially cut into that pricing model is likely to be welcomed by players.

Chris Morris
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Chris Morris has covered consumer technology and the video game industry since 1996, offering analysis of news and trends and…
Microsoft has acquired Activision Blizzard: What does that mean for you?
The key art from when Microsoft finally acquired Activision Blizzard.

Microsoft now owns Activision Blizzard. After Microsoft worked to appease regulators and fend off litigation, the $69 billion acquisition first announced in January 2022 is finally complete. Now that Activision Blizzard is officially part of Microsoft and a sister company to Xbox Game Studios and ZeniMax Media, that raises an important question: What does this acquisition mean for you as a player?

Following this acquisition, Microsoft will own more gaming studios, the availability of Call of Duty and other Activision Blizzard franchises will shift, and unionization efforts within Activision Blizzard could gain a bit more ground. If you're wondering what happens next, here's our thorough examination of how the deal could impact players moving forward.
Microsoft's new game studios
With this acquisition, Microsoft will now own all the developers under the Activision Blizzard company. That includes the teams at Activision Publishing, Blizzard Entertainment, and King, the latter of which is the developer behind the wildly popular mobile series Candy Crush. The acquisition encompasses the following subsidiaries as well: Treyarch, Infinity Ward, Raven Software, Sledgehammer Games, High Moon Studios, Beenox, Toys for Bob, Activision Shanghai Studio, Solid State Studios, Demonware, Digital Legends, and Major League Gaming. Microsoft now also owns the rights to all of the games and IP Activision Blizzard previously released.

Read more
You don’t need an Xbox Series X to play Starfield. Here’s how
Key art for Starfield.

Starfield is the highest-profile Xbox Series X and Xbox Series S game since Halo Infinite, but the game isn't locked to those two consoles. Thanks to cloud gaming and Microsoft's more open-ended mentality of making its games available on a wide variety of platforms, you don't have to own one of Microsoft's current-gen systems or have the Xbox app installed on your PC.
No, it's not on PS5 or Nintendo Switch, but if you want to play Starfield while it's at the center of the video game industry zeitgeist, here are some places where it's playable other than the Xbox Series X, Xbox Series X, and Xbox PC app.
Steam

The most obvious choice if you want to play Starfield elsewhere is to pick it up on Steam. While Microsoft does have a proprietary PC launcher of its own, Microsoft now consistently releases its own games through Valve's launcher. Bethesda joined Xbox Game Studios in 2021 and has a long history of making its games available on Steam as well, so it's not too surprising that Starfield is available on the platform.
Starfield already proving quite popular on the platform too, having peaked at 266,000 concurrent players, according to SteamDB at the time I'm writing this. If you're looking for a way to play Starfield natively on the hardware you own without using a Microsoft platform or service, this is your best option. It'll run on Steam Deck too, although that's not the only way to experience Starfield on the go.
Xbox Game Pass app on Android

Read more
I ditched my consoles and went to cloud gaming for a week – here’s how it went
A table holding a DualSense controller, a DualSense Backbone, a regular Backbone, and an Xbox Series X controller.

Game streaming has felt like the "next big thing" in gaming for the past decade. I recall trying out services like OnLive back in my college dorm room, playing the same 30-minute trials over and over again. Half the time the service never booted, and the half that it did was a lag-filled mess. Fast forward a couple of years and Sony acquires Gaikai to integrate into PlayStation Now (RIP), but left it largely ignored until Xbox began its push into streaming with its Xcloud initiative. With major tech giants like Google and Amazon failing to crack the game streaming code, Sony and Microsoft appear to be the only two capable of supporting this console-less method of play.

For all the fancy talk about new servers and top-of-the-line streaming technology, I've never been convinced that game streaming would be able to replace the tried and true local experience. After all, even under perfect internet conditions, the speed of light is only so fast. And assuming even most people will have perfect internet conditions itself is laughable. However, I wanted to put my money where my mouth was. How could I judge game streaming if I didn't actually give it a shot?

Read more